Scozzafava dropping out of NY race!!!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1009/BREAKING_Scozzafava_drops_out_of_NY_23.html

This is huge! Now Hoffman can kick out the democrat.

What Scozzafava fails even now to admit, it wasn't that her opponents were able to spend more, it was her willingness to spend the taxpayers money! She was running as a Republican but was the epitome of what we call RINO - Republican In Name Only. You can't spend like a Democrat and expect to retain your republican base.

This is a perfect example how we have to be willing to vote for the true conservative in our elections, not just the person with the "R" next to their name. I hope this serves as a warning to other RINO's coming up for reelection next year. You may be in for a surprise.

Congratulations Doug Hoffman, this should be a sweet victory for you in more ways than one. You stuck to your principles and it paid off. Now, don't let us down, we'll be watching.

New & Improved Pelosi Plan!

1990 pages! Outrageous. Can't wait to see what CBO makes of it. I've been flipping through the Brief Summary and the Detailed Summary, here's just a few pieces I've found so far:

HSA reimbursements: do you have one? enjoy using it for over the counter medications? Well that will end under this plan. Also contributions will be limited to $2500 a year and withdrawal for non-medical will increase from 10% to 20%. Yeah. Swell.

Affordability Credits for up to 400% Federal Poverty Limits. Oh great! that should help struggling families with the cost of insurance! One little problem, the credits are ONLY if you participate in the exchange (government option). Yeah. Swell.

Think you'll be able to get only the coverage you need and leave out the crap coverage like maternity care (I'm 53, no thanks). No. Sorry. Plans are still all inclusive. Some savings there.

Wanna keep your current plan? Make sure it's acceptable or you'll pay an additional tax. How do you tell if it's acceptable? Heck if I know. Read this and see if you can understand it: Sec. 501. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage. Provides for a 2.5% additional tax on the modified adjusted gross income of an individual who does not obtain acceptable health coverage for the individual or dependents claimed on the individual’s tax return. Authorizes the Department of Treasury and the Exchange to establish a hardship exemption from the additional tax. Acceptable coverage includes grandfathered individual and employer coverage, certain government coverage (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, certain coverage provided to veterans, military employees, retirees, and their families, and members of Indian tribes), and coverage obtained pursuant to the Exchange or an employer offer of coverage. Did you understand any of that? Didn't think so.

And in a few places I think I am seeing some reduction in pre-tax advantages..... more swell.

Sec. 541. Disclosures to carryout health insurance exchange subsidies. Permits the Exchange to receive taxpayer return information from the Internal Revenue Service in order to assist the Exchange in determining subsidy eligibility. Insert raised eyebrow....

I skipped over the Medicaid/Medicare parts, sorry, but I'm not that versed in the subject to tell when they are getting screwed. I'm sure they are.

Here's a link if you want to check it out: http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_hcr_section_by_section.html

It loads very SLOWLY!!! I only got to page 40 something of 61 Detailed Summary before my computer said ENOUGH!

Glenn Beck Refounders as of 10/26/09

He's up to 9 now! Watch out Washington, you just never know when you could be talking to a Beck snitch!!!!!

Fall of the Republic

This is a series of 14 youtube videos about the Federal Reserve, the criminal activities of Ben Bernanke and many more. The corporate also are pointed out in great detail. This was put together by Alex Jones, who I am NOT a big fan of, but this series does indeed have merit. Rep. Ron Paul has been pushing for years to submt the Federal Reserve to a first time in 96 years audit.

You have to watch these.

http://www.conservativeforchange.com/2009/10/fall-of-republic.html

Death Panels - who really began that issue?

And I bet you thought it was Sarah Palin? Or it just had to be that evil Glenn Beck. Hmmmm, you might be surprised to learn it was an Obama Advisor in September 2007!

Listen up.

They've lost their mind - control of ALL waters?

Congress Moves To Seize Control of All US Waters

This is one (of many) part that worries me:

The proposed definition states: "The term 'waters of the United States' means all waters subject to ebb and flow of the tides, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes [a flat dried up area, esp. a desert basin...] natural ponds and all impoundment of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution."

The "impoundment"???? I don't think so Scooter!!!!!!!!!!! What they hell are we doing? We have a well, does that mean they know control our water? Tell us to convert to county system and pay for what we previously owned?

Has anyone heard of this before? Of course not! Congress just draws up this crap and tries to pass it before anyone sees it. Luckily SOMEONE is checking the voting schedules of Congress or we'd never know what was going on. WHY? Because what is supposed to be the people's Watch Dog, the media, no longer does their job.

This could have a profound impact on farmers, orchards, cattle ranches, just think of any place or business that uses water. I bet this is a back door way for them to push through parts of their Cap & Tax bill, because they know it will not pass in it's original form. No means No!!!!!!!! They don't get that.

Once again it is up to us. Call, write, email your Representatives and Senators that this is wrong.

How Many Refounders Does Beck Have?

Someone asked this question so thought I'd post where he is so far and I believe he is now at 5. Sounds like one might even be in the White House!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anita Dunn - admires.... wait for it.... Chairman Mao!!!

I'm sure by now you have heard, at least on CNN, how Anita Dunn, The White House Communications Director, has accused Fox News of being nothing more than the "investigative" arm of the Republican Party. They certainly aren't "a real news source like CNN".

Anita has some very good credentials for being able to twist the truth and put forth propaganda to promote her chosen agenda, or in this case, President Obama's agenda.

But now Glenn Beck has one of his secret Refounders sending him this video of Anita Dunn. Quite amazingly, turns out that Anita's two favorite and most admired political philosophers are Chairman Mao and Mother Teresa. Mother Teresa we can all understand but Mao????

Here's the part that urks me the most. Her speech is for high school students. Is history being rewritten to the point where someone responsible for up to 70million deaths is a person to be admired??? Do you want your kids to think he's a good guy?

Yet again, we find another person close to the President with questionable motivations.





But wait you say, they will just let her "resign" in the middle of the night, just like Van Jones, so no biggy right? I'm pretty sure they thought of that when the decision was made to attack Fox. Could she have been chosen specifically for this job? Knowing, she was expendable? She is after all, only in this position temporarily:

Why Anita Dunn

New World Order - Part Two

On May 1, 2009 I issued the following challenge:

I DARE you to watch this video to the end.

***http://***www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSVDM2LZhOs*** unfortunately it has since been removed from YouTube, hope you saw it. Search YouTube for New World Order, you'll find lots.

Did you watch it? Too late, it's gone.

Tomorrow, a new book comes out, "America For Sale" by Jerome Corsi, who was also on Hannity/Fox tonight.

What is the New World Order? Most people heard the phrase for the first time from President H. W. Bush (the book review says President George W. Bush, but it was Dad not Son, although Son may have also used the term).

Leaving out the religious anti-Christ interpretation, the New World Order is the theory of a group of elitists working on a global scale to bring all nations into one "government". Going back to Roosevelt and Wilson, the establishment of the League of Nations (leading to the United Nations), the Federal Reserve and the beginning of entitlement programs. We've also heard the phrase from President Jimmy Carter and now President Obama along with his "fundamentally transform" agenda.

It is in all it's forms, from the most benign to the most evil, an effort to completely destroy our constitutional form of government. Tied in very closely with the Progressive movement (see articles on Cloward & Piven and a Followup). Many actually thought more global governance was a good thing, that it would help resolve problems that supposedly could not be handled locally. Good intentions gone wrong. Politicians have notoriously refused to analyze the "unintended" consequences of any new idea.

Mr. Corsi has brought all the theory and facts together on the New World Order, also known as global New Deal, explains it so we can all understands but also puts forth ideas for fighting it! That is where his book is different, it is not all gloom and doom; there is hope.

"America For Sale" is going on my reading list.

"An Inconvenient Truth" in your child's school?

Health care discussions winding down, time for the Crap & Tax crowd to come back out to push their agenda.

Did you know many schools show Al Gore's documentary (gag on that) "An Inconvenient Truth" as part of their curriculum? A truck driver in Britain took it to court to keep it out of their schools. The court found 11 inaccuracies with the movie, I've pulled this from a Newsbusters story:

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

Back to LW: Folks, we have a dilemma here, and it is not climate related. Everyone involved in this Cap & Trade scheme stands to make a LOT of money, especially Al Gore. Gore will be directly involved in setting up the trading system, making it yet another "commodity exchange" just like the Chicago Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange.

GE is heavily invested in manufacturing of wind turbines and special batteries, which is explanation for why the CEO Jeffrey Immelt has his media outlet, NBC News so dedicated to pushing Obama's agenda. Which also explains Janeane Garofalo's incessant beat down on conservatives, she is employed by NBC.

Gore was questioned by a journalist about the inaccuracies listed above during a recent environmental meeting, amazingly the journalists mike was cut off. He never got an answer. I think Mr. Gore needs to be willing to have a serious debate before running our electric bills up and creating yet another entitlement program for those who can't afford to pay.

Followup to "Where are they taking us?"

American Daughter's segment on "Hate Crimes Legislation-Back Door Censorship" was more than timely when viewing this headling from today:

Hate Crimes Measure as part of Defense Funding

This makes me ill when they attach a bill onto another totally unrelated. And both the Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this. If it's a worthy bill, it should be able to stand on it's own!!!

Where are they taking us?

With the ease of a progressive, they will slip right in there, "what's so bad about socialism", "we are part of a global community", "collectively we can get more accomplished", "it's morally the right thing to do".

Words are important things people. We were told early on what would happen in just this four year period, "fundamentally transform" and we didn't stop to think what that really meant. We have been asleep for a very long time while they slipped in during the dark of night (ok getting melodramatic here but it's fun) to feed us little bits and drabs of socialism till we wake one day only to realize we've given away our rights and our children's rights.

Goals to take over or collapse our system to be replaced with their own include gaining control over:

transportation
communication
food
healthcare/medicine
manufacturing
finance

Keep the list handy and check off each item as it happens. But only if you are too stupid or asleep to stand up and stop it BEFORE it happens.

I know, you sit there and think that the liberals haven't succeeded in anything substantial in decades so why the alarm bells? Why when all the policies they get in place actually end up failing? But are they failing? Or do they actually have a plan, a plan to overload the system, create their crisis (never let a good crisis go to waste).

That is exactly the strategy put forth in the sixties by Cloward & Piven, radical leftist Columbia University professors.

Cloward and Piven stated that the ruling classes used welfare (Democrats!!) to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. This all began with the Los Angeles Watts riots for Cloward & Piven but the Progressive Movement began much earlier.

American Daughter has an excellent three part series on Cloward & Piven with a final installment entitled "Hate Crimes Legislation - Back Door Censorship". What is especially eye catching to me is the dates - all before the election. They were warning us about Obama BEFORE he won the election. And we didn't listen.


But back to Cloward & Piven. Overloading the system to prove it's inadequacies became their modus operandi. They organized to bring more and more onto the welfare rolls. They started voting rights groups that eventually grew into what we now know as ACORN. They also have strong ties to George Soros' Open Society Institute.

Discover The Networks also has a great write up of our lovely couple. And they are an excellent source of information in general.

If you can read these articles and still sit back to watch Survivor or The Good Wife well, then I have nothing for you. Here's hoping at least a seed has been planted.